Money in politics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Money in politics - Essay Example However, National Football League (NFL) gave donations to political parties and politicians to cover up for the evils they do to the players such as the way they deal with retired or injured players (The Center for Responsive Politics). What do organizations expect to get in return after donation enormous cash to specific politicians? Money does not always bring election victory. For example, Romney had colossal donations than Obama, but he never won (The Center for Responsive Politics). Sometimes overspending in election may result to financial difficulties. For example, Democratic Party was left with a debt of $21.5million which is quite enormous even if the Parties’ presidential candidate won the election. It was not pleasing for FBI to invade the office of one of the supporters of Senator Menedez Robert in South Florida (The Center for Responsive Politics). America is a mature and democratic nation where freedom of individuals should be respected without any infringement. However, it is promising that the workers unions are continuing to strengthen especially for the public servants. In the Center for Responsive Politics (The Politics of Super Bowl XLVII), It is fascinating how some people can get rich from politics while others are becoming poorer. Senator Tom Harkin (D-Lowa) who has a chance of being re-elected in 2014 has no interest in politics and intends to retire after serving the current term. He managed to save $2.8 million from campaign donations, whereas some people were left in debt. It is unhealthy for institutions to spend a lot of resources to influence their decisions in the states affairs, whereas the state should equal protection and representation of institutions at all governance levels. Politics should be based on individual performance and potential without monetary influence

P2P Networks Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

P2P Networks - Essay Example At present, a majority of these P2P file sharing networks offer very little limitations as to the kind of files that are being exchanged across this network, especially since this type of sharing is done directly with other computers, meaning, you are downloading from another person’s computer and vice versa. In the end, it will leave a user being entertained or gratified while the copyright laws of the content creators are being breached. The rights of all should be acknowledged and copyright laws should be respected. In other words, some regulations need to be implemented to reduce if not completely halt the illegal distribution of copyrighted files. The Entertainment Industry especially has since been plagued with the many acts of piracy, which is not good for business and also unethical. Can you imagine a business that gives out their merchandise as freebies everyday? Exactly, they would be broke! Now try and relate that to the Entertainment Industry. Producers invest a lot of money in it expecting to make a profit from sales. The only thing is that, it is not being sold; instead it is being distributed for FREE by probably millions! Due to the nature of this file sharing, each computer downloading from each other, a more rational argument on who to blame for the illegal activities taking place there would be the administrators. It is almost certain that there are professionals out there who can maybe add some HTML script to the site to help differentiate between copyrighted material, non-copyrighted material and material available under a Creative Commons License. Copyrighted material should be blocked from being added to the site and its searches in the first place. This way, copyrighted material cannot be downloaded from a particular P2P site and this is the administrator’s responsibility. Personally, the Researcher uses a P2P network. Despite its unscrupulousness, their lack in restrictions screams â€Å"it’s a flea market, buy